Looks good. On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 08/12/2010 10:41, Nathalie Furmento a écrit : >> I would rather go for a solution like this: >> >> Node L#1 (P#0) >> Socket L#1 >> PU L#2 (P#3) >> >> to be more homegeneous. > > Thanks, I think I like it. I'll commit something like that unless > somebody complains by tomorrow. > > Brice > > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-devel mailing list > hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
