Jeff Squyres, le Wed 08 Dec 2010 16:49:46 +0100, a écrit : > On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > Le 08/12/2010 10:41, Nathalie Furmento a écrit : > >> I would rather go for a solution like this: > >> > >> Node L#1 (P#0) > >> Socket L#1 > >> PU L#2 (P#3) > >> > >> to be more homegeneous. > > > > Thanks, I think I like it. I'll commit something like that unless > > somebody complains by tomorrow. > > Looks good.
Yep. Samuel
