Le 09/06/2010 21:52, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> Le 09/06/2010 21:41, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
>> On Jun 6, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Olivier Cessenat wrote:
>>> What you write is clear to computer scientists, but I failed to figure
>>> out what it meant. Sorry, it is clear now !
>> FWIW, there's a section about "output formats" in the hwloc-ls.1 man page.  
>> It's probably worth adding a sentence in there that the list in the man page 
>> applies to the filenames; i.e., that the filename determines the output 
>> format.
> By the way, I wonder if we should have explicit --input and --output
> options to clarify the lstopo command-line.
> For instance
>     lstopo --xml file.xml file2.png
> would be better written as
>     lstopo --input file.xml --output file2.png
> So basically, I am saying that --input/-i would be a superset of our
> current --xml, --synthetic and --fsroot. And --output/-o would be
> implicit when passing an filename argument on the command line. And we
> could have --output-format/--of to enforce the output without looking at
> the filename extension (and maybe --input-format/--if to enforce
> xml/synthetic/fsroot).

Most of the above (except the addition of an explicit --output before
the filename) is available in the lstopo branch.


Reply via email to