> This correction is not far from what the OP said the correction should be > (0.12). Also, it's just a guess... but I'll bet that he originally set > the pitch to 1.2 to compensate for the sample rate mismatch (whether he > knew it or not). > > -gabriel >
Hola! Yes, this is exactly what happened. I have resampled the 48k to 44k and it fits perfectly without any pitch shifting. Thanks for the help! jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
