Thank you for providing the test case. The webrev looks good to me.
Is it ok to push this to OpenJDK6 (swing forest as used for i18n)?
Do you mean OpenJDK7? If so, yes, we use the swing forest for i18n. Thanks, Masayoshi On 1/8/2010 2:13 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Bug 6584033 actually fixes two issues, the second relating to the interaction between the timezone setting, the security manager and signed jars: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=381 It was fixed in OpenJDK7 b22, but there is no testcase to ensure this doesn't regress. Mark Wielaard provided one and this has since been approved for OpenJDK6 by Joe Darcy (along with the backported fix): http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2009-December/001036.html Here's a webrev of the test as applied to OpenJDK6: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6584033/webrev.01/ Is it ok to push this to OpenJDK6 (swing forest as used for i18n)? Thanks,
