OK, hope this is the final webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8038092/webrev.4/
Naoto
On 7/3/14, 1:22 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/07/2014 17:59, Naoto Sato wrote:
Ok, now I think I got what you mean. So it could regress in two ways,
one is what you wrote below, and the other I am seeing. So instead of
modifying the existing test case, I just add a new one which basically
is the same one in the previous webrev as follows:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8038092/webrev.3/
This way they can detect those two possible regressions.
Okay, I see where you are going. To avoid duplicating the testing then
you should have the one test run twice (two @run lines). One run could
be with a property set that you check in the static initializer so that
you can decide whether to preload BidiBase.
-Alan.
