On 26 Oct 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Same thing in the font encoding tables used by the freetype backend > and by Luit. The two types of tables should be kept identical. > > Can other people confirm that this is indeed the right thing to do? I > can imagine how it may break things, e.g. by making it impossible to > select a JIS X 208 reverse solidus and paste it into an 8859-1 client.
In ksc5601.h in the same directory as jisx0208.h is found, reverse solidus in KS X 1001 (formerly KS C 5601) is mapped to the full width reverse solidus as suggested for JIS X 0208. So, this is not even consistent across character sets. Anyway, I'm for 'fixing' jisx0208.h as suggested. Your case against appears not very important in practical cases because JIS X 0208 is rarely used alone but almost always used with US-ASCII in which case reverse solidus is usually drawn from US-ASCII not from JIS X 0208. Jungshik Shin _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
