On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 16:30, Keith Packard wrote: > Let me rephrase the question in the context of this discussion -- in > attempting to identify which languages a given font is suitable for, I > believe I shouldn't expect fonts designed for HKSCS to support the non-BMP > encodings, and so shouldn't exclude fonts missing non-BMP glyphs as > unsuitable for zh-hk documents.
Agreed. It would take a while before fonts that cover non-BMP glyphs appear on the market. > A secondary question is whether I should > check the PUA entries; I believe I probably shouldn't, and let the zh-hk > support rest on whether the font covers the non-PUA BMP subset of HKSCS. This is probably a safe assumption. But, are there many fonts out there not made for zh-hk but have thousands of glyphs in the PUA? Cheers Roger -- Roger So Debian Developer Sun Wah Linux Limited i18n/L10n Project Leader Tel: +852 2250 0230 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +852 2259 9112 http://www.sw-linux.com/ _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
