ES> -- for example, Arabic-Indic numbering, plus, minus, Arabic shadda to
ES> name a few.
ES> Would be it safe to assume that those charactes should be assigned a
ES> unicode codepoint instead of directly going to keysymdef.h?
No.
If a key has an ad hoc keysym definition, it *must* use it for
compatibility with legacy applications and libraries.
If a key has no ad hoc keysym definition and corresponds to a Unicode
codepoint, it *must* use the Unicode keysym for compatibility with
current XFree86 libraries.
Having multiple keysyms for a single character is where madness lies.
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
