Le mar 26/08/2003 � 16:09, Kent Karlsson a �crit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > The problem is - most users wouldn't care less if there was a single > > clean layout per language or group of languages (we wouldn't > > Yes, but that requires some standardisation effort. > > > be in this mess for example if there was a single latin layout and > > countries hadn't had to invent variations on a common core to > > accommodate the glyphs qwerty forgot). > > ["glyphs" -> "characters"] > > Ahem. There are quite a lot of 'latin letters that qwerty forgot', and > some are used quite frequently in some languages, and there deserve > their own keys, even on levels 1&2. For punctuation and symbols, I > agree with you more.
Sure. When countries can not even agree on the dot/number location, what should we expect ? There is room for some serious merging and standardisation - anyone who had to switch between layouts knows it. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
