On Sat, 17 May 2008, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sun, 4 May 2008 13:06:20 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > Defend the i2c refcount calls against NULL pointers, as is important > > > (and conventional) for such calls ... we don't want to morph NULL > > > pointers into bogus non-null ones. > > > > Passing NULL to the current functions would just crash, it wouldn't > > morph anything. > > That's only if you assume an MMU set up to cause oopsing on reference > to the first and last pages of memory. Not the best of assumptions...
Maybe BUG_ON(!client) would be better? It seems more likely to catch a programming error. _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
