On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:19:27PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > I agree that in theory something wrong could happen in the current > state of things if the extra addresses of the 24C00 chip are not > "protected" by the at24 driver, but in practice I very much doubt that > it'll happen, and if it does, it would be easy to fix. So I reiterate > that the at24 driver doesn't need to handle this. After removing i2c_addr_mask, it turned out that it just needed one if-case and anonther flag to handle the 24c00-quirk. Hoping that this will be the only case needing such treatment ;), I think it is worth the price.
Sidenote: I just finished hacking in all points from my to-do-list. Now, I want to validate the implicit casts and give the driver some really good testing as some parts had to be rewritten for v3. All the best, Wolfram -- Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
