On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > Attached is the I2NSF Oct 5 interim slides. > > > > Here is the Etherpad: > http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/i2nsf-interim-2016-10-05
Hi Linda, Was the webex session recorded? If yes, could you please share a pointer? I dont see my comments about slide 5 in the etherpad so I want to reiterate on the list: I am working with Rafa and Gabi, and they were unable to attend the interim meeting, though I managed to do so. The answer to the question on slide 5 about *ipsec-flow-protection,, which will focus on IPsec management However, we are looking for your response to the question that was sent to you offline. I am including that question here, in case it slipped through the cracks due to its absence on the list. Please provide the clarification requested below. > Subject: Re: Next steps about SDN and IPSec > From: Rafa Marin Lopez <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:59:14 +0200 > Cc: Rafa Marin Lopez <[email protected]>, Gabriel Lopez <[email protected]>, > Sowmini Varadhan <[email protected]>, > David Carrel <[email protected]> > > Hi Linda: > > El 30 sept 2016, a las 22:20, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> escribi > > > > Rafa, > > > > Is your draft to address the 3.1.10 of the I2NSF problem statement = > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/) > > [Rafa] As you well know our I-D is focused on IPsec management. > Nevertheless, we feel that i2nsf scope in key distribution is broader > (though the current text in section 3.1.10 is perhaps focused on routing > In this sense, our I-D is focused in the details of IPsec SAs, which is > just one example of the need of key distribution based on SDNs. > > Therefore, regarding your question, are you looking for a more general > I-D to cover 3.1.10? Or would you expect several I-Ds covering different > aspects of key distribution? > > > Please provide comment to the draft if the description is not quite > > right. We are about to call WGLC for the revised version. > > [Rafa] Generally speaking, I think the text seems focused in routing. In > any case, we can provide more detailed comments about this section in > the mailing list. > > Best Regards. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
