Dear Linda: Please see my comments inline.
> El 11 oct 2016, a las 0:13, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> escribió: > > Sowmini, > > Here are the answers to your questions are inserted below: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sowmini Varadhan [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Hi Linda, > > Was the webex session recorded? If yes, could you please share a pointer? > [Linda] I am afraid that the session wasn't recorded properly. > > I dont see my comments about slide 5 in the etherpad so I want to reiterate > on the list: I am working with Rafa and Gabi, and they were unable to attend > the interim meeting, though I managed to do so. The answer to the question on > slide 5 about *ipsec-flow-protection,, which will focus on IPsec management > > [Linda] Your draft "draft-xx-ipsec-flow-protection" needs more discussion to > figure out if it belongs to Client facing interface related drafts or NSF > facing related drafts. [Rafa] In my opinion, NSF facing related drafts. In fact, draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection focuses on the interaction between the security controller and the NSF. > > > However, we are looking for your response to the question that was sent to > you offline. I am including that question here, in case it slipped through > the cracks due to its absence on the list. > > [Linda] My answers are inserted below: [Rafa] Mine, as well. Please see inline. > > Please provide the clarification requested below. > >> Subject: Re: Next steps about SDN and IPSec >> From: Rafa Marin Lopez <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:59:14 +0200 >> Cc: Rafa Marin Lopez <[email protected]>, Gabriel Lopez <[email protected]>, >> Sowmini Varadhan <[email protected]>, >> David Carrel <[email protected]> >> >> Hi Linda: >>> El 30 sept 2016, a las 22:20, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> >>> escribi >>> >>> Rafa, >>> >>> Is your draft to address the 3.1.10 of the I2NSF problem statement = >>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-c >>> ases/) >> >> [Rafa] As you well know our I-D is focused on IPsec management. >> Nevertheless, we feel that i2nsf scope in key distribution is broader >> (though the current text in section 3.1.10 is perhaps focused on >> routing In this sense, our I-D is focused in the details of IPsec SAs, >> which is just one example of the need of key distribution based on SDNs. >> >> Therefore, regarding your question, are you looking for a more general >> I-D to cover 3.1.10? Or would you expect several I-Ds covering >> different aspects of key distribution? > > [Linda] Section 3.1.10 should be broader than your draft. As long as your > draft fits in the description, it would be helpful if you can move your draft > further with data model or (at least the information model). [Rafa] It definitely fits in the description. Therefore, following your advice we should work with data model and/or information model. > >> >>> Please provide comment to the draft if the description is not quite >>> right. We are about to call WGLC for the revised version. >> >> [Rafa] Generally speaking, I think the text seems focused in routing. >> In any case, we can provide more detailed comments about this section >> in the mailing list. >> > [Linda] can you provide the suggested text for the section? That would be > very helpful. [Rafa] I already provided those suggestions, but we haven’t received any comments yet. Please see: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/KYKDe3as2tNa4tqpl70y5vwphqw Gabi also provided his comments in: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/V1fdfzv4vPppuSQLzOMfWFnxYxk Another suggestion is that, perhaps, this IPsec use case could be included somehow in section 4 as an example to cover "section 3.1.9 Lack of Mechanism for Dynamic Key Distribution to NSFs”. What do you think?. Best Regards. > > >> Best Regards. > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf ------------------------------------------------------- Rafael Marin Lopez, PhD Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC) Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia 30100 Murcia - Spain Telf: +34868888501 Fax: +34868884151 e-mail: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
