Dear Rafa,

Thanks for pointing us to this draft. We now have a better understanding on how 
i2nsf WG would likely address the dynamic key distribution requirements.

We, on the other hand, are in the process of defining the control plane 
architecture to be integrated with SDN Controllers, focusing on automated 
registration, certificate issuance and dynamic trust establishment between 
gateways/SFs positioned across different security domains. These will be the 
pre-cursory requirements for dynamic key distribution, if Gateways/SFs don’t 
already share the trust relationship. Thus, we don’t see any overlap per say 
between what we are working on and this particular work, but these are 
certainly adjacent to each other. We’ll perhaps request for your review once we 
are done with our part, and incorporate your comments, if you would have any.
If you would like to take a look at the current version of our draft, you can 
find it here – 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chattopadhyay-sdnrg-multi-party-sdn-trust/.

Thanks again for your kind response.

Warm Regards,
Saurabh

From: Rafa Marin-Lopez [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:29 PM
To: Saurabh Chattopadhyay - ERS, HCL Tech <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafa Marin-Lopez <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; King, Daniel 
<[email protected]>; Liushucheng (Will) <[email protected]>; Kaushik 
Datta - ERS, HCL Tech <[email protected]>; Kohei Shiomoto 
<[email protected]>; Gabriel Lopez Millan <[email protected]>; Sowmini 
Varadhan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Queries on i2nsf's intended coverage over multi-domain 
opsec automated provisioning

Dear Saurabh:

Regarding your comment about "a dynamic key distribution mechanism to NSFs”, we 
would like to point you out to our work regarding an SDN-based IPsec Key 
management, where key distribution is performed to establish IPsec security 
associations. We also consider the case of having two (or multiple) SDN 
controllers . See Section 10.2.  Gateway-to-gateway under different SDN 
controllers. Here, an interface between SDN controllers will be required.

Although it is focused on IPsec, other security associations may be considered 
in the future.

Is this related with what you had in mind?

Best Regards.
El 18 nov 2016, a las 7:57, Saurabh Chattopadhyay - ERS, HCL Tech 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:

Dear Authors,

I and my co-author are currently working on SDN& NFV operation security related 
area, and developing a draft in SDN Research Group. We wanted to understand 
from you on certain aspects of i2nsf problem statement and its intended 
coverage, thus writing this mail.

From the draft (draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-04), we understood that 
you have acknowledged the challenges associated to scenarios where NSFs being 
present in heterogeneous administrative domains, and also have considered 
developing a dynamic key distribution mechanism to NSFs. In this context, we 
have the following queries –


•         In certain scenarios, dynamic key distribution appears to be a 
requirement for endpoints and other (non-security) functions as well. Do you 
intend to develop the mechanism in a generic fashion that can be leveraged by 
other entities as well?
•         Specially for multi-domain scenarios, dynamic key distribution may 
need some pre-cursory requirements to comply with, these are mostly around 
setting up inter-domain trust and certificate chaining. Do you consider these 
to be pre-provisioned, before the i2nsf specified mechanism starts off?

We’ll look forward to your response on this.

Warm Regards,
Saurabh



::DISCLAIMER::
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.
E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information 
could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in 
transmission. The e mail and its contents
(with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on 
the originator or HCL or its affiliates.
Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the 
author and may not necessarily reflect the
views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, 
dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of
HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
delete it and notify the sender immediately.
Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and 
other defects.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

-------------------------------------------------------
Rafa Marin-Lopez, PhD
Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC)
Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia
30100 Murcia - Spain
Telf: +34868888501 Fax: +34868884151 e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
-------------------------------------------------------




_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to