FWIW, On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) < [email protected]> wrote:
> One more point: I’ve noticed your point that at some point people just > want to get their document through the process. I’m aware of this > ‚problem‘. On the one hand, I think that actually good: I’m happy if people > are sure about the content and see no problem in letting the IESG figure > out the actual less important questions about processing. On the other > hand, I agree that we should of course try to avoid any kind of confusion > people may have. And, on the OTHER other hand, I've certainly seen authors who said "just tell me what it needs to say, to clear your Discuss". Happily, I've seen less of that with recent IESGs, but it's still something we need to watch for. If the AD knew what the document should say better than the authors, the wrong person is the author ... Spencer
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
