Hi, Agree with John. It is mature and stable enough to be used as a foundation, though there are some additional terminology we’ll have to deal with.
Be goode, On 25 May 2017, at 22:20 , John Strassner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Adrian, I vote #4 (Yes, I think this is something we can use as our foundation). Please note that we have (at least) some additional terminology to sort out concerning attestation. Prior to that, I plan on doing a thorough review. Any comments that you have are of course more than welcome! best, John On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi WG, The framework document got updated to match the terminology document which was a good first test. Now we would like to make sure that the terminology as currently documented is something we can all work with. Hence this call for review and opinion. Please respond to the question "Is the terminology draft stable?" 1. No. Major changes are needed. If you do this you are duty bound to point out the problems, and you are expected to help solve them. 2. Yes, but I haven't really read it. If you do this we will chuckle and probably make you stand up at the next WG meeting. 3. Yes, but I have some minor concerns. You'll need to point them out and help fix them, but we will still be able to consider the document as a good basis for future work. 4. Yes, I think this is something we can use as our foundation. Note that Linda and I don't intend last-calling this document for a bit as we suspect new terms will show up as other work progresses. Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf -- regards, John _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/ e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ---------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
