Yoav, I totally agree with you that we should focus on the updates and discussion for important issues.
As you know, my SKKU team have revised the drafts along with our SKKU open source project in Github for I2NSF: https://github.com/kimjinyong/i2nsf-framework According to your guideline, we will prepare for the slides with status update and next steps so that each draft can be presented for 2~5 minutes and discussed for 5~10 minutes. For the report of IETF-101 Hackathon I2NSF project, I would like to present the progress and next plan in 5 minutes. The contents of this Hackathon I2NSF project are as follows: 1) The Support of RESTCONF for Consumer-Facing Interface according to the lastest Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model. 2) Dynamic Selection for NSFs at Security Controller according to high-level security policy delivered via Consumer-Facing Interface. 3) SFC Support using OpenDaylight's OVS SFC Implementation for SFC-based Traffic Steering according to I2NSF Capabilities Information Model. For the I2NSF Applicability WG document, I will report the updates and next steps: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability/ I hope to let this WG document be under WG Last Call after this IETF-101 WG meeting according to our WG milestones: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/i2nsf/about/ As you know, my SKKU team are working on three I2NSF interfaces, such as Consumer-Facing Interface, NSF-Facing Interface, and Registration Interface with information and YANG data model experts, such as Sue Hares, Frank Xia, and Henk Birkholz. Especially, the two YANG data models of Consumer-Facing Interface and NSF-Facing Interface have become our WG documents through the WG adoption calls with comments from John Strassner, an information model expert. I will report the comments during the WG adoption calls and the corresponding resolutions in this WG meeting. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/ I believe that the information model draft of Consumer-Facing Interface is ready for WG adoption call because the mirrored Consumer-Facing Interface YANG data model WG document is well-synchronized with it. That is why I requested a WG adoption call for the information model draft of Consumer-Facing Interface: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im/ I believe that the NSF capability YANG data model draft is ready for WG adoption call because it is well-synchronized with the NSF-Facing Interface YANG data model WG document and it is revised with John Strassner's comments during the WG adoption call for the NSF-Facing Interface YANG data model draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-data-model/ In this IETF-101 WG meeting, I would like to briefly present the updates and next steps for these data models and let our WG members discuss them. In addition, I would like to present the updates and next steps of Registration Interface and then listen to the WG's opinion to decide whether my SKKU team need to continue to work for this Registration Interface: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-im/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm/ For other drafts, such as NSF monitoring data model and SFC-based traffic triggered, I would like to show the brief updates: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hyun-i2nsf-nsf-triggered-steering/ The NSF monitoring data model draft was revised by Henk's suggested data model and also he joined the work of this draft as a new author. As WG chairs, Linda and you can prioritize the drafts and allocate appropriate timeslots for them according to our WG milestones and your WG management policy. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:09 AM, Yoav Nir <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Paul > > That’s a total of 75 minutes, 70 of them for various drafts. So what is > the intent here? > > Last time we had a whole bunch of presentations that were pretty much a > primer on what this draft is about. Working group sessions are supposed to > be about discussion, and the attendees are assumed (perhaps naïvely) to > have read the drafts. I don’t want another round of primers. If the point > is a status update, we can make an 8-slide deck with a quick status for > each draft and run through that in 10-15 minutes. > > Can you give me an outline of what things are to be discussed? > > Thanks > > Linda and Yoav > > > On 8 Mar 2018, at 8:22, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Linda and Yoav, > I would like to request timeslots for IETF-101 I2NSF WG Session as below: > > 1. IETF-101 Hackathon I2NSF Project > - Presenter: Jaehoon Paul Jeong > - Time: 5 min > > 2. Applicability of Interfaces to Network Security Functions to > Network-Based Security Services > - draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-02 > - Presenter: Jaehoon Paul Jeong > - Time: 10 min > > 3. I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model > - draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-00 > - Presenter: Jaehoon Paul Jeong > - Time: 10 min > > 4. I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG Data Model > - draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-00 > - Presenter: Jinyong Tim Kim > - Time: 10 min > > 5. I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model > - draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-data-model-06 > - Presenter: Jinyong Tim Kim > - Time: 10 min > > 6. YANG Data Model for Monitoring I2NSF Network Security Functions > - draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-02 > - Presenter: Jaehoon Paul Jeong (or Henk Birkholz) > - Time: 10 min > > 7. I2NSF Registration Interface Information Model and YANG Data Model > - draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-im-04 > - draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-03 > - Presenter: Jaehoon Paul Jeong > - Time: 10 min > > 8. Service Function Chaining-Enabled I2NSF Architecture > - draft-hyun-i2nsf-nsf-triggered-steering-05 > - Presenter: Jaehoon Paul Jeong > - Time: 10 min > > Thanks for your coordination. > > Best Regards, > Paul > -- > =========================== > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. > Assistant Professor > Department of Software > Sungkyunkwan University > Office: +82-31-299-4957 > Email: [email protected], [email protected] > Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php > <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php> > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I2NSF WG session will be Wed march 21 9:30am~12pm. >> >> Please let us know if you need presentation slot, and how long is your >> presentation. >> >> If you need remote presentation, please let us know as soon as possible. >> >> >> >> Thanks, Linda & Yoav >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: WGChairs [mailto:[email protected] >> <[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Meetecho IETF support >> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 9:27 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Cutoff date for requesting remote presentations support at >> IETF101 >> >> Dear chairs, >> >> as usual, please book your remote *presentation* slots at IETF101 by >> filling out the following form: >> >> https://ietf101.conf.meetecho.com/index.php/Remote_presentations >> >> *The cutoff date is March 16, 2018.* >> >> You can also check scheduled remote presentations here: >> >> https://ietf101.conf.meetecho.com/list.php >> >> Thanks, >> the Meetecho team >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I2nsf mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >> >> > > -- =========================== Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Software Sungkyunkwan University Office: +82-31-299-4957 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
