On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > Not necessarily. If you look, for example, at RFC 7224, it is IANA's > > responsibility to keep the registry in sync with the YANG module. No further > > effort is required from the WG that prepared the initial revision of the > > module. > > What is "the YANG module" ? > > I don't think IANA has any responsibility other than RFCs directing them > to update IANA registries. How do you imagine any updates to happen, and > how would IANA "sync" this automatically? >
There are IANA maintained YANG modules (and before we had YANG there were IANA maintained MIB modules). Numbers maintained in registries sometimes need to be in machine readable formats and then IANA documents procedures to make updates both in their internal registry and in an IANA maintained YANG module. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
