On 4/10/19, 7:11 AM, "yang-doctors on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[email protected] on behalf of
[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > Not necessarily. If you look, for example, at RFC 7224, it is IANA's
> > responsibility to keep the registry in sync with the YANG module. No
further
> > effort is required from the WG that prepared the initial revision of
the module.
>
> What is "the YANG module" ?
>
> I don't think IANA has any responsibility other than RFCs directing them
> to update IANA registries. How do you imagine any updates to happen, and
> how would IANA "sync" this automatically?
>
There are IANA maintained YANG modules (and before we had YANG there
were IANA maintained MIB modules). Numbers maintained in registries
sometimes need to be in machine readable formats and then IANA
documents procedures to make updates both in their internal registry
and in an IANA maintained YANG module.
It seems this could all be done with tooling. However, AFAIK, generation of new
versions of IANA YANG models had not be implemented yet.
Thanks,
Acee
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
yang-doctors mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
