On 17/02/2022 17:00, Linda Dunbar wrote:
Hello Working Group,

Many thanks to the authors to address all the comments from YANG Doctor review.

This email starts a three-weeks Working Group Last Call for  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm/

I think that this is premature. As ever, there is substantial overlap with other I-D in the set, notably nsf-facing, and, as ever, the two I-D do things differently which I think can only confuse. If there is a reason for the differences, then that needs calling out IMHO; at the moment it seems arbitrary, such as which ...art reviewer last saw the I-D!

Further, nsf-facing has just attracted a large number of comments from IESG Review, many if not most of which apply here. I think it wrong for the IESG to be asked to do the same work all over again so I think that the IESG comments on nsf-facing need resolving with the IESG first and then the agreed solution - I expect that most of the comments by the IESG will be accepted - can be incorporated into this I-D.

Choice of protocols, reference for protocols, way of specifying ranges of numbers, indeed way of specifying at all, string language, volte, RFC793 redundant, all those comments by Alexey on lack of clarity, Rob's comments on identity descriptions, example labelling and so on.

Tom Petch

This poll runs until March 10, 2022.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document, please 
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors.

If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly 
respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in 
conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you.

Linda




_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf


_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to