Hi, One of the ADs doing a final review of the draft charter is struggling with the difference or overlap between 'architecture' and 'framework'. In response to a previous comment from him (saying he did not see how an architecture could be written before the solution specs) I inserted the term "high-level". He now says...
> You mentioned "high-level" in "High-level architecture and framework". > That's a step in the right direction. > Personally, I would change all instances of "High-level architecture and > framework" to "High-level architecture" Personally, I can't see that this would make any difference. I only like "architecture and framework" because it kills the discussion of "Is this an architecture document or is it a framework document?" So I could make his change without feeling too depressed. Would this cause anyone a peptic ulcer? Adrian _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
