It is minor issue, so I don't mind, or no objection, AB
On 1/24/13, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > One of the ADs doing a final review of the draft charter is struggling with > the > difference or overlap between 'architecture' and 'framework'. In response to > a > previous comment from him (saying he did not see how an architecture could > be > written before the solution specs) I inserted the term "high-level". He now > says... > >> You mentioned "high-level" in "High-level architecture and framework". >> That's a step in the right direction. >> Personally, I would change all instances of "High-level architecture and >> framework" to "High-level architecture" > > Personally, I can't see that this would make any difference. I only like > "architecture and framework" because it kills the discussion of "Is this an > architecture document or is it a framework document?" So I could make his > change > without feeling too depressed. > > Would this cause anyone a peptic ulcer? > > Adrian > > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
