On 03/14/2013 02:02 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Ahhh so you are stating that to provision services on the network in
vendor neutral way I will not be able to use I2RS by design ?
Is this already agreed point that NETCONF (or any other form of
configuration) will be required anyway in addition to I2RS for any
complete service provisioning ?
I don't think there are many already agreed points anywhere outside the
charter itself. So don't worry if I think something you don't like; I'm
at least as likely to be wrong as anybody else.
Still, I am inclined to think that RIB manipulation is separate from
permanent configuration. And while you could run a service by
hand-configuring your RIBs everywhere with I2RS (with either a
persistent I2RB state or reconfiguration on reboot from the controller),
it doesn't seem like the *right* way to do it. It makes more sense to
establish your normal behavior through the existing configuration
mechanisms (CLI, NETCONF, etc), and then use I2RS to manipulate it.
-Dave
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
