Yes, we need to figure out remote participation, but there should be some mechanism - and probably 1 or more remote design-groups.
Alia On Mar 22, 2013 4:03 PM, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi: > > Are you planning to have remote participation via WebEx or similar? > > Thanks > > Regards … Zafar > > From: Alia Atlas <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Alia Atlas <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 8:04 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [i2rs] Interim meeting > > Ed and I would like to have an interim meeting in mid-April in the > Mountain View/Sunnyvale, CA area. We are trying to time it for around the > Open Networking Summit, but not conflicting with that or the ONF workdays. > > We need to announce it 4 weeks in advance. Unless, we announce today > for the afternoon/evening of April 19 (or into April 20), we are looking at > April 22/23. Opinions ASAP from those who would attend would be quite > useful. > > In particular, is this a good time/place? > > We want the interim to focus on the use-cases & functionality for i2rs. > I expect that we'll ask attendees to pick a set of use-cases to be in a > design-group before & during the meeting to discuss & then present to the > larger group. More details to follow soon. > > Regards, > Alia > > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
