We can't do the 19/20th now - we need 4 weeks for the announcement and the
consensus favored April 22/23.

Alia

I would prefer 19-20, I light of clash with NFV#2****

** **

Regards****

** **

*Deepanshu Gautam*

Senior Engineer, Service Standards, Huawei****

O: +86 25 56620008 M: +8613585147627****

** **

*From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
Behalf Of *Alia
Atlas
*Sent:* Friday, March 22, 2013 11:28 PM
*To:* Joel M. Halpern
*Cc:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [i2rs] Interim meeting****

** **

Yes, the ONF workday finishes at 1:30pm on Friday.   I'm getting the sense
that April 22/23 works better for most people, with a slight concern for
overlapping NFV#2.****

Alia****

On Mar 22, 2013 3:57 PM, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote:****

Note: The ONF Member work day is actually two days, April 18th and 19th.
Thus, having the meeting on the 19th would actually collide with the ONF
work session.  That does not seem to me to be a good dea.

Yours,
Joel

On 3/22/2013 8:27 AM, Alia Atlas wrote:****

I am specifically trying to determine if there is strong interest in the
Friday April 19 & April 20 vs. April 22-23.

Alia

On Mar 22, 2013 1:13 PM, "Robert Raszuk" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

     > April 22/23 @ Bay Area

    Perfect location and timing !  +1.

    Thx,
    Robert.


     > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
     >
     > Ed and I would like to have an interim meeting in mid-April in
    the Mountain
     > View/Sunnyvale, CA area. We are trying to time it for around the Open
     > Networking Summit, but not conflicting with that or the ONF workdays.
     >
     > We need to announce it 4 weeks in advance.  Unless, we announce
    today for
     > the afternoon/evening of April 19 (or into April 20), we are
    looking at
     > April 22/23.  Opinions ASAP from those who would attend would be
    quite
     > useful.
     >
     > In particular, is this a good time/place?
     >
     > We want the interim to focus on the use-cases & functionality for
    i2rs.   I
     > expect that we'll ask attendees to pick a set of use-cases to be in a
     > design-group before & during the meeting to discuss & then
    present to the
     > larger group.  More details to follow soon.
     >
     > Regards,
     > Alia
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > i2rs mailing list
     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
     >
    _______________________________________________
    i2rs mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs



_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs****
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to