Juergen, On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:04:04PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:02:18PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > The binary encoding of FORCES may help with speed. > > It was asserted elsewhere (copied below) that this may only be 3-5% of a > > speed improvement. (I had thought I recalled a discussion in netmod(?) at > > one point of a BER format for YANG, but my google-fu is failing me.) > [...] > Perhaps all boxes that are targets for I2RS can be assumed to have > hardware crypto and hence this is a non-issue. But I think it is > important to keep the bigger picture in mind when we talk about > performance (and I assume I2RS will not pass through the IESG with a > plaintext transport mode).
Not speaking for the chairs, I'd hope the WG would consider this blatantly against what we're hoping to do. The goal of the WG is to help make routing system information more available. Requiring new hardware to implement our proposals goes counter to that idea, IMO. :-) -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
