On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:12:15AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > Thanks for posting on that draft. Google was kind to find it for me. > For other folks, Robert is talking about his draft here: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-varga-netconf-exi-capability-01 > > I thought ive heard claims that "CPUs are fast enough, dont worry" > and this draft's problem statement is (to make netconf): > " ... more efficient from both CPU and bandwidth utilization perspective... > > What do you have to say for yourself Jan/Thomas ? ;->
Frankly, I think it is the job of those who propose alternate encodings to provide evidence that the proposed encoding leads to noticable improvements. And I like to insist on security being included in such a study since NETCONF by definition runs over secure transports. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
