On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> wrote:

> Forgot to change the topic.
> I would like to follow up and build on this - but i wanted to make sure
> there was some sanity first.
>
>
Which drafts shows 1 I2RS client performing a network-wide edit
across N locked I2RS agents?

The agents do not coordinate with each other.
The clients do not coordinate with each other.
This is currently out of scope for the I2RS protocol.

cheers,
> jamal
>

Andy


>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and model
> To: Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andy Bierman <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>"
> <[email protected]>, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>"
> <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 23, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
>
> > I thought I2RS is starting out focusing on 1 client and 1 agent.
>
> Dont think so.
>
> > Network locking across devices is out of scope.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have same opinion as you on this one, just wanted to spell it out one
> more
> > time explicitly, as I heard some discussions where network locking was
> > coming up.
> >
>
> Either I am misunderstanding both of you or both of you misunderstood the
> requirement.
> The idea is to allow a single writer per object as a starting point.
> OTOH, if you really mean what you say then I violently disagree.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> PS:- Changing the topic so this is not lost in the noise because i think
> that
> the many clients-single agent brings needs for other protocol requirements.
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to