On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Which drafts shows 1 I2RS client performing a network-wide edit > across N locked I2RS agents? >
There is a requirement to allow only one client to own write access to a specified object in order to avoid locking. There is nothing objecting to a client being able to write to multiple objects as long as that rule is met. > The agents do not coordinate with each other. > The clients do not coordinate with each other. > > This is currently out of scope for the I2RS protocol. > Both assertions true. But what i was responding to is: There are multiple clients that connect to the same agent. And a client can connect to multiple agents. I believe that such a requirement _may_ call out certain features in the protocol. Essentially the agent is a broker. cheers, jamal >> cheers, >> jamal > > > Andy > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:24 AM >> Subject: Re: [i2rs] consensus on I2RS protocol and model >> To: Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]> >> Cc: Andy Bierman <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>" >> <[email protected]>, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>" >> <[email protected]>, "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Apr 23, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> > I thought I2RS is starting out focusing on 1 client and 1 agent. >> >> Dont think so. >> >> > Network locking across devices is out of scope. >> > >> > >> > >> > I have same opinion as you on this one, just wanted to spell it out one >> > more >> > time explicitly, as I heard some discussions where network locking was >> > coming up. >> > >> >> Either I am misunderstanding both of you or both of you misunderstood the >> requirement. >> The idea is to allow a single writer per object as a starting point. >> OTOH, if you really mean what you say then I violently disagree. >> >> cheers, >> jamal >> >> PS:- Changing the topic so this is not lost in the noise because i think >> that >> the many clients-single agent brings needs for other protocol >> requirements. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> i2rs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > > _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
