Hi Sri, Thanks for your thoughtful review! Responses in-line.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Sriganesh Kini <[email protected] > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Working Group, >> >> The original deadline for comments on WGLC for the problem statement and >> architecture drafts of May 30 has passed with no comment whatsoever. >> >> While we all realize that there's a bit of exhaustion going on with regard >> to these drafts, they are a bit of process we simply must get done in >> order >> to fully move forward with our agenda of putting together data models. >> >> We are *NOT* going to hold that work up further - it is clear that there >> is >> consenus to start making that progress. >> >> To assist us with putting this work behind us, please respond to the >> following questions: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/ >> Have you read the problem statement draft? >> > > Yes. > > >> Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? >> (If no, please respond to the list with issues.) >> > > Yes. > > >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/ >> Have you read the architecture draft? >> > > yes > > >> Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? >> (Ditto.) >> > > A question in sec 7.8. Second para. There is a sentence starting with "The > mechanism for this is to ..." and later it says "In order for this approach > to ...". The first sentence seems to imply that this is the only mechanism > allowed by this architecture whereas the second sentence seems to imply > that this is one possible mechanism and agents can choose other mechanisms > too. Which one is correct ? I would suggest that the language be updated to > reflect that. > [Alia] I think the confusion is that there are two mechanisms - one to ensure predictability that the I2RS Agent does and one for the I2RS Client to use to realize when its operations have been preempted. I've clarified the "The mechanism for this is to" to say "The mechanism for ensuring predictability is to have a simple priority associated with each I2RS clients, and the highest priority change remains in effect." Thanks, Alia > Otherwise the doc looks good to be published as a RFC. > > Sri > > >> >> -- Jeff >> >> _______________________________________________ >> i2rs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs >> > > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
