Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2014, at 6:39 AM, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Sep 24, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Andy Bierman > >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> We can allow multiple ephemeral data stores, but the only dependency > >> can be with the NC config datastore. Example: > >> > >> residential services > >> business services > >> > >> > >> > >>> What does this really mean? > >>> I did not understand the details at the interim. > >>> Does this mean each datastore has separate data models? > >> > >> yes, each data store has separate data models > > > > Now I am confused. At the interim we agreed (and you argued for :) > > that the schema (= data models) is the same for the config and > > ephemeral datastore. > Here is an example. The device supports x number of features and has a > data model that represents the whole device. From that data model > (schema), I decide to build a service that is using only parts of all > available and store it into ephemeral DB, example L3VPN. Now in > ephemeral only L3VPN service configurations will be stored.
This is fine. This means that the *schema* is the same for both data stores, but the instance data is different. Note that the set of data models make up the schema; thus both data stores have the *same* data models (same schema), not separate. /martin _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
