On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the proposed overlay model, presume that we have ephemeral data from a > > model that lives within an augmentation to a local config model. In other > > words, the ephemeral nodes are children of the local config nodes. > > > > Presume, per discussion, that the local config lives in the "config" data > > store and that the ephemeral config - the augmenting nodes above - live in > > the ephemeral data store. > > > > If we delete the container in the local config that the epehemeral config is > > augmenting, is there any expectation that such a deletion should carry > > through to the ephemeral config? > > > > Per the netmod interim discussion, probably not. > > My interpretation of the interim discussion is that the deletion > carries through.
To be clear what I meant, consider: local config: ephemeral: A A/B - B is introduced as an augmentation of A If A is deleted, the question is whether we had B as an orphan or not. Thus, it "carries through" in the sense that the merge results in inconsistent state rather than B being deleted as well. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
