On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:20:36AM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > If I am reading you correctly, you are saying taht if an I2RS client > is manipulating data that is stored in the underlying golden store, > you want that golden store changed. > I think that won't work for the requirements. As far as I can tell > from your proposal, this would result in I2RS changes being stored > when someone on the CLI does a commit. Which is not what is wanted.
I agree with you, Joel. This doesn't match the semantics the I2RS WG wanted. > Conversely, a read-through model would seem to work. Objects which > have been created / modified in the I2RS store, when read from the > I2RS store have their I2RS value. If you attempt to read or > reference a value that has not been modified in I2RS, you > read-through to the underlying data store, and see its value. Hopefully my most recent example shows this. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
