On 9/29/14 8:40 PM, Susan Hares wrote:
Joe:
By shoe dropping - I think you mean accepted of the traceability as WG
draft.
Yes, that is correct. We had a few signs of support, and Carlos sent an
email out copying the chairs explicitly, but we have not heard anything
back.
Joe
Sue
-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Clarke
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:55 PM
To: Jeffrey Haas; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [i2rs] IETF 91 meeting requested - call for agenda; status
reports?
On 9/25/14 2:00 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Your chairs have been a bit over-busy recently with travel to unicast
people doing various bits of chartered work. This means we've been
behind on some of our goals in terms of getting regular design
sessions running. I know that at least a couple calls have happened
that I've missed that Sue Hares has done, so some progress is being made.
We've requested a 1 hour time slot for IETF 91 in Honolulu to give us
a chance to talk. This is a call for agenda slots.
This is also a call for status reports.
We've had some productive discussion about requests to netmod/netconf,
albeit ones that haven't converged yet.
What have you been up to?
I think the list knows about the traceability "shoe" that's been waiting to
drop. Question is, can it be settled on the list, should we ask in
Honolulu? Does it need an agenda item or can the chairs raise the point?
Thanks.
Joe
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
