On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:36:25PM -0400, Alia Atlas wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As noted in a prior message, this path is complicated by not having > settled > > > on what I2RS config looks like in an ephemeral datastore. > > > > Absolutely - and since I2RS is still doing info models until there is a > > clear direction, split of the work, and recharter. > > Per prior discussions and our last session, the WG was suggested to go > forth > and start writing data models - knowing that they'll be incomplete until > this is settled. Info models were okay to generate from the data models if > a separate info model provided no additional useful context. > Absolutely - that was the direction I encouraged and what I was expecting to consider as part of a recharter. Yes, your chairs are behind on sending the recharter request from this > discussion. > It's ok - I've found other charters to go rewrite ;-) This discussion (or rather the one about "option 4") and understanding what differences would be, if any, for I2RS data models is very very useful to have before touching the charter. Alia > > -- Jeff >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
