Working Group, My apologies for the late upload of the agenda. Your chairs crossed streams about who had the token to do the post. :-)
The agenda for this session has been kept intentionally limited. The mailing list has been generally quiet aside from the discussion surrounding the netmod interim in New York City earlier this year. The goal for this meeting is to try to reach some closure on this core issue or, if not closure, to advance the discussion in a productive fashion. One item I would like to proactively draw the working group's attention to is the mount-point drafts: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-00 (Note that Cisco has asserted IPR against these drafts.) These drafts, while not specifically targeting I2RS use cases, cover some of the same underlying issues as the I2RS ephemeral state requirements. That said, there's been a lot of productive i2rs related work happening elsewhere. Examples include i2rs use case implementation details against other protocols and work on topology models. Authors of i2rs related drafts are encouraged to discuss things on the mailing lists to keep the work fresh. We believe we should be requesting adoption for some of these drafts soon. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
