Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > One item I would like to proactively draw the working group's attention to > is the mount-point drafts: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-00 > (Note that Cisco has asserted IPR against these drafts.) > These drafts, while not specifically targeting I2RS use cases, cover some of > the same underlying issues as the I2RS ephemeral state requirements.
Jeff, can you elaborate? I don't understand how the mount technique is related to I2RS ephemeral state. mount is a way to incorporate data from some datastore into another, and this seems to be orthogonal to I2RS requirements for ephemeral state. /martin _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
