This may be hard to reach consensus on but it would be great if there were statements positioning I2RS versus NETCONF configuration and management. Thanks, Acee
From: Tina TSOU <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 6:49 AM To: Alia Atlas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [i2rs] simple rechartering underway Dear Alia et al, Questions for clarification, which interface does i2rs do? Between who and who? Thank you, Tina On Mar 7, 2015, at 7:06 AM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Given the excellent progress that the WG has been making - due to your work and interest, I have been working on a simple rechartering with Sue and Jeff. The new proposed charter is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-i2rs/. It adds the ability to work on a filter-based RIB model. It allows I2RS to work on YANG data models to supports its in-charter use-cases. It clarifies that the topology work will be done starting with a generic topology model. Regards, Alia
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
