On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 03:57:29PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > > The I2RS L2 protocol topology is the protocol independent topology. Just as > Alexander Clemm points out that the L3 topology may be a virtual composite > of either the static setting or a combination of the protocol specific > topologies, the L2 topology is a virtual composite of the lower L2 > topologies. >
Why is a "virtual composite of the lower L2 topologies", needed to achieve the goals of I2RS? Since IEEE 802 networks are reasonably common technology, I think a "virtual composite of the lower L2 topology" should make sure it represents IEEE 802 topologies well. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
