I have no IPR to declare related to this draft, nor do I know of any. Regards,
Gonzalo On May 26, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/> from (5/26 to 6/9) (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/) I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9) Carlos, joe, and Gonzalo – please indicate whether you know of any IPR on this draft. This document is a companion to three other documents for I2RS requirements which have WG calls: 1) This begins a 2 week adoption call for draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-req: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs/ This document covers requests to the netmod and netconf Working Groups for functionality to support the ephemeral state requirements to implement the I2RS architecture. Status: WG adoption call (5/26 to 6/9) 2) draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-01<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/ [This draft is an early set of requirements from which the ephemeral state and “identity, secondary-identity and priority” were pulled into draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs. The notification-subscription were pulled into the draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirments. The traceability had been separated before draft-haas-i2rs-nemod-netconf-requirements was published. This draft remains the only source for mutual authentication requirements (section 2.2), transaction requirements, and the history of the discussion. This draft is being requested to be adopted as a general roadmap for the I2RS WG. In the future, the I2RS WG will accept more detailed specification on the mutual authentication or the transaction protocol. I2RS Status: WG Adoption (5/26 to 6/9) 3) draf-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-02. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements/ I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9) This thread is to discuss WG consensus on draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/> . Please discuss the merits of the traceability framework described in this draft as being part of the requirements forwarded to netmod/netconf. Also discuss if this framework provides the necessary things for I2RS deployment. This draft will also be forwarded as part of the requirements to the IESG. Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
