On 5/26/15 6:05 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) wrote:
I have no IPR to declare related to this draft, nor do I know of any.
No, no IPR.
Joe
Regards,
Gonzalo
On May 26, 2015, at 5:54 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/> from
(5/26 to 6/9)
(http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/)
I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9)
Carlos, joe, and Gonzalo – please indicate whether you know of any IPR
on this draft.
This document is a companion to three other documents for I2RS
requirements which have WG calls:
1)This begins a 2 week adoption call for
draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-req:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs/
This document covers requests to the netmod and netconf Working
Groups for functionality to support the ephemeral state requirements
to implement the I2RS architecture.
Status: WG adoption call (5/26 to 6/9)
2)draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-01
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/>
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements/
[This draft is an early set of requirements from which the ephemeral
state and “identity, secondary-identity and priority” were pulled into
draft-haas-i2rs-ephemeral-state-reqs. The notification-subscription
were pulled into the draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirments. The
traceability had been separated before
draft-haas-i2rs-nemod-netconf-requirements was published. This draft
remains the only source for mutual authentication requirements
(section 2.2), transaction requirements, and the history of the
discussion. This draft is being requested to be adopted as a general
roadmap for the I2RS WG. In the future, the I2RS WG will accept more
detailed specification on the mutual authentication or the transaction
protocol.
I2RS Status: WG Adoption (5/26 to 6/9)
3)draf-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-02.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements/
I2RS Status: WG LC (5/26 to 6/9)
This thread is to discuss WG consensus on
draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-02
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/> .
Please discuss the merits of the traceability framework described in
this draft as being part of the requirements forwarded to
netmod/netconf. Also discuss if this framework provides the
necessary things for I2RS deployment.
This draft will also be forwarded as part of the requirements to the
IESG.
Sue Hares
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
