In line for emphasis.
Joel
On 7/14/15 2:39 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Joel,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:22:01PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
...
As a nice-to-have, allowing clients to specify different priorities
for different operations is acceptable. But it is not necessary.
As a nice-to-have, I don't believe the architecture clearly explains such an
ability to alter priority. Please work with Alia to update the architecture
document to clarify this if you believe this property is important.
I don't consider the property of variable priorities important. You
raised it in your description. As far as I am concerned, the
description Juergen sent to the list (priority is derived by AAA from
the client identity) meets the requirements.
I am very concerned that as I2RS expresses its requirements, we need to
be clear which things are requirements, and which things people ahve
thought of since (such as variable priority) but are not WG requirements.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
