A few more comments below.  Mostly, I think I understand you.
Thanks,
Joel

On 7/13/15 10:26 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:


On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Andy, I am not following your comments.  Questions in line below.
    Joel

    On 7/13/15 10:07 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:



        On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Joel M. Halpern
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

             The flexibility Jeff has described, and you have commented
        upon, is
             permitted but not required by (what I understand of) the
        agreements
             of the WG.  If it can be easily done, it seems like a nice
        thing to do.


        It means the priority, client-ID, and 2nd-id all need to be
        saved per
        subtree.


    per subtree?  The client-ID needs to be saved with the changed node.
    The secondary ID ought to be saved there, but is not required.  If
    we want to support variable priority, then we would need to record
    the priority.  Otherwise, recording the priority is an
    implementation acceleration, as it is determinable from the client ID.


If the client creates a list entry then the priority applies to the list
node
and its descendants -- that's what I mean by subtree,
Okay.


Is the 2nd-id sticky?

If /foo is created with 2nd=app21 and it is updated later
with a new value, but no 2nd is provided, is the old 2nd
reported (as per traceability requirements doc?)

Or is the 2nd forgotten by the server as soon as it is logged?
So the update edit would have no 2nd-id (as the request specified)?
2nd ID is,as far as I can tell, per-operation.
If the Client does not send a second ID with a specific operation, then the Agent will presume that there is no second ID. So the early second ID (which was logged when the operation was performed) will be removed. And will therefore not be included if a later error message is generate. That is what the client has indicated by not including a secondary ID on the operation.

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to