Joel: I agree it was much clearer as two documents.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 2:41 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Alia Atlas' Subject: Re: [i2rs] draft-mglt-i2rs-security-requirements-00 2 Week WG adoption call (8/17 to 8/31) If others in the WG agree with you, presumably the chairs will direct that and we will do so. Having tried to work on a single document, it seemed to us to be MUCH cleaner to have two separate ones. Yours, Joel On 8/17/15 2:34 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:04:22PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: >> Juergen: >> >> Normally, I would agree with you. However, these environmental >> security issues are not directed at the I2RS protocol but the >> environment. I thought it would be clearer to have this split so the >> I2RS protocol development work would not need to considered these hard requirements for the protocol. >> > > I reviewed both documents before the last IETF meeting and I believe > one document is all that is needed. > > /js > _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
