Linda and Russ: I agree that having the broker pretend to be different clients is a good idea even if it is not optimal.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 11:01 AM To: Russ White; 'Andy Bierman'; 'Jeffrey Haas' Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Jeff Haas'; [email protected]; 'Alia Atlas'; 'i2rs'; [email protected]; 'Joel M. Halpern'; 'Susan Hares' Subject: Re: [i2rs] some doubt about "draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00".// I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00.txt +1. Linda -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Russ White Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 4:34 AM To: 'Andy Bierman'; 'Jeffrey Haas' Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Jeff Haas'; [email protected]; 'Alia Atlas'; 'i2rs'; [email protected]; 'Joel M. Halpern'; 'Susan Hares' Subject: Re: [i2rs] some doubt about "draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00".// I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00.txt > The design does not directly support different priorities per broker. > The broker needs to pretend to be different clients, and each session > will have a different client-id and priority. This is non-optimal but not broken. And it's much simpler to implement. It would leave proxies out of scope while allowing those who want to implement proxies a way to do so. In short -- this seems like a good solution. Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
