> On 09 Oct 2015, at 22:16, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 09 Oct 2015, at 15:00, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Lada, >>> I2RS is not chartered to do the base models. There are other routing >>> models that reference routing-cfg and even in-progress implementations. >> >> Of course, I am aware of them. However, assuming that changes resulting from >> I2RS operation will be available for inspection as state data to >> NETCONF/RESTCONF clients, and vice versa, it's important that the those >> routing data models and I2RS data models remain compatible and coordinated. >> >> A data model for RIBs should IMO be developed simultaneously for both >> purposes, and common parts implemented as groupings so as to be reusable >> without copying-and-pasting. >> >>> >>> On 10/9/15, 4:13 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka" >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the >>>> relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and >>>> netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearly target the same management >>>> data in a router. I can see three possible scenarios: >>>> >>>> 1. The i2rs-rib module will be modified to augment >>>> ietf-routing/ietf-ipv[46]-unicast-routing. >>> >>> This would seem to be the obvious choice. >> >> I agree, and so far it can be done quite easily. >> >>> >>>> >>>> 2. The scope of ietf-routing will be changed so that it would address >>>> only host routing and simple routers. The modelling work for advanced >>>> routers will be done elsewhere. >>>> >>>> 3. The work on netmod-routing-cfg will be stopped. >>> >>> A fourth option would be for me to take over ownership, move the work to >>> the RTG WG, and we’d recruit some strong authors/reviewers from operators >>> and other vendors (involving the ADs in selection). >> > > You mean i2rs-rib-data-model?
We are talking about a bigger picture, and i2rs-rib-data-model is a part of it. Lada > > Regards, > > Behcet >> Yes, that's what I meant. >> >> Thanks, Lada >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Opinions? >>>> >>>> Thanks, Lada >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> netmod mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >> >> -- >> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> i2rs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
