Hi Lada, NETMOD, 

So I think we should move forward this ietf-rtg-cfg so that it can be
augmented and other work can move forward. We are still in disagreement
with respect to routing-instance/interface configuration.

    - We feel the IPv4/IPv6 interfaces should reference the
routing-instance in their config state. This is consistent with
draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-01.txt.
    - You feel that the routing-instance should have a list of leaf-ref’s
to the interface. You believe the leaf-ref provides a level of validation
due to the fact that references can be confined to routing-instance
references. However, heretofore, no models are referencing the interface
leaf-refs in the list.

Other than the Routing YANG Design Team having chosen the first option -
are there any other opinions?

Thanks,
Acee

On 10/9/15, 9:00 AM, "netmod on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Lada, 
>I2RS is not chartered to do the base models. There are other routing
>models that reference routing-cfg and even in-progress implementations.
>
>On 10/9/15, 4:13 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka"
><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the
>>relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and
>>netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearly target the same management
>>data in a router. I can see three possible scenarios:
>>
>>1. The i2rs-rib module will be modified to augment
>>ietf-routing/ietf-ipv[46]-unicast-routing.
>
>This would seem to be the obvious choice.
>
>>
>>2. The scope of ietf-routing will be changed so that it would address
>>only host routing and simple routers. The modelling work for advanced
>>routers will be done elsewhere.
>>
>>3. The work on netmod-routing-cfg will be stopped.
>
>A fourth option would be for me to take over ownership, move the work to
>the RTG WG, and we’d recruit some strong authors/reviewers from operators
>and other vendors (involving the ADs in selection).
>
>Thanks,
>Acee 
>
>
>>
>>Opinions?
>>
>>Thanks, Lada
>>
>>--
>>Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>netmod mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to