Linda, the problem is that there is no such thing as an I2RS protocol, much less version 1 of such a protocol. If I2RS is using NetConf, the protocol is NetConf. If it is using RestConf, then that is the protocol.

Further, the exact mechanism to express what the agent can do over these protocols is defined by those mechanisms.

I can't argue with your observation that there is not much to the requirement as reworded. I consider that it is not vacuous because it confirms that we need the relevant capability information. I recognize that the NetConf and NetMod working groups have been very good about doing that.

My primary point, as I have said several times on the list, and saqid on the webex, is that the requirement as written was not a description of what we requried, but of a possible (and in my personal view incorrect) way of meeting the requirement.

Yours,
Joel

On 6/1/16 6:48 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
Joel,

The existing text and the proposed test mean different things to me. The 
existing text is to say support I2RS Version 1, whereas the proposed text 
states a very obvious statement.

If I2RS client didn't have the needed "communication mechanisms" to I2RS agent 
or can't decide if the communications mechanisms needed is supported, how can I2RS client 
even start to send commands to I2RS agent?

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 9:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [i2rs] ephemeral requirements - REQ 08 bullet 1

Existing Text:
1.  protocol version support for I2RS modifications - (e.g.  I2RS
        version 1)

Proposed Text:
1. Support for communication mechanisms to enable an I2RS client to determine 
that an I2RS agent supports the mechanisms needed for I2RS operation.


This probably is already met by existing NetConf mechanisms.  I think it is 
useful to state anyway, so that solution development will verify that it is met.

Yours,
Joel

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs


_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to