Support both drafts. The base network topology model is fundamental for other topology models, and the L3 topology model is an important augmentation to the base model. Both drafts are in good shape.
Best regards, Jie From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:09 PM To: [email protected] Cc: 'Benoit Claise' <[email protected]>; 'Russ White' <[email protected]>; 'Alia Atlas' <[email protected]> Subject: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt ( This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-04.txt (9/20 to 10/4) and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt from 9/20 to 10/3. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/> In considering this draft, the I2RS WG should consider: 1) Does the implementations of this draft in ODL open source code base sufficient experience on the Yang drafts? 2) Does anyone know of other implementations of this model? 3) Do you believe this Yang model is stable enough to publish and distribute to yang libraries? We did a WG LC in August, but we suspect this got caught in the August vacation email. Sue Hares and Russ White Co-chairs
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
